System Comparison from Australia

Aquaponics Siphon System Trial Results

Siphon System Final Growth

I’ll get back to Cooling with Enthalpy next week.  We just had a baby girl on Sunday, so I’m a bit busy 🙂 This week, I’d like to point you to an excellent trial from Backyard Aquaponics that compared three types of grow beds under exactly the same conditions.  The link is to a 40 page thread, so pour yourself a tall one before you start 🙂

The Trial

In this 2010 trial from Australia, they compared a variety of types of veggies grown in three systems, identical except for the method of supplying water:

  • Constant Siphon
  • Constantly Flooded
  • Timed Flood and Drain (15/45 min)
Aquaponics Constant Flood Trial Results

Constant Flood Final Growth

The result from this small 18 month trial is that timed flood-drain wins, hands down, across most plant types with faster plant growth, more worms, and larger fish.  It also used less energy since the pump switched on and off. The constant-flood and bell siphon systems traded back and forth for 2nd place.  In the end, certain kinds of plants did better in constant flood and others with the siphon. They provided no explanations for why they thought the results were what they were, though others made a lot of speculations across the 40-page thread. They were trying to be un-biased, so avoided making judgments.

Aquaponics Timed Flood Drain Trial Results

Timed Flood-Drain Final Growth

One of the most interesting findings, to me, was that the systems all tracked along a consistent temperature profile. I would have suspected that the flood and drain would have been cooler due to more evaporation, but it didn’t happen that way.  This might have implications for cold weather.

The fact that constant flood and siphon systems did just as well as each-other in growth makes me think that constant flood would have the edge over siphon, since you don’t need a sump tank. On the other hand, it did produce a lot of slugs. Flood-drain with an indexing valve wouldn’t need a sump tank either. The pictures included are of the final growth, though this is after 18 months of crop rotation and harvesting.  Unfortunately, they didn’t weigh the produce output from each system though they did take many photographs.  There are many more pictures, detailed figures, and helpful comments on the thread.  It’s an education.

Advertisements

2 responses to “System Comparison from Australia

  1. Jerimiah-

    Congratulations on the birth of your daughter. You can post some photos of her next to the Aquaponics.

    -Terry

    Like

What do you think? Add a comment.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s